Quite a few models have been released in a month:
GPT5.6, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.6, Muse Spark 1.1,
Kimi K3, Qwen 3.8 Max, Long cat 2.0, Laguna S 2.1, Ling 3.0, etc
But I will stick to testing small param LLM for my edge device.
Of course, I only tested on my system and my use case. Other people will have different experiences when testing on different criteria and frameworks.
I am developing Agentic workflow in my own AI system, every model is graded the same. But I'm sure tweaking the parameters and fine-tuning the model would yield different results.
I haven't tested Nanbeige yet, that involves installing it's fork of llama.cpp and building it in Jetson which could take over an hour.
Yes.
To develop a brain for future humanoid on edge device.
To explore variously AI models and learn how to build harness around them.
To learn another language by practicing with AI.
Just think of it as a project of making a brain for future humanoid robot on edge device.
Thank's for the insight.
I tweaked the LLM temperature and parameters a bit but still prefer the tone of Ministral.
Bonsai and Ministral are created for different purpose. Bonsai is condensing a Qwen model to fit in low memory system, Ministral is finetuned by larger Mistral to do multimodal in edge device. I did test with same system prompt and Ministral tends to adhere more to the prompt but also likes to make up something out of nothing (ie. hallucination).
As for the routing or even agentic workflow, I have been trying to adapt the DAG to keep use of LLM to minimal.
I also did a few test on the Cactus-Compute's Needle 26M model for query generation and tool execution.
It takes ave 3s per tool call which is slow but was able to gen json queries for a prompt that require up to 4 tools calls. It's small memory footprint means I could do multi-agent in Jetson Orin Nano 8GB. But I don't know if JAX would work in Jetson. That would be my next tasks to check it out.